
A biomass boiler in a new housing development at Cross Street South, Wolverhampton. Photo by Stephen McLaren.
This page provides an initial overview of the technologies available to reduce carbon emissions. More detail on each of the technologies can be found on separate pages.

A biomass boiler in a new housing development at Cross Street South, Wolverhampton. Photo by Stephen McLaren.
The choice of energy technologies occurs at all scales of implementation, but can be most effectively steered at regional, city and neighbourhood scales.
The list below explains how ‘renewable’ different energy generation systems are. The definition of renewable is currently consistent with the building regulations, Code for sustainable homes and BREEAM definititions. Individual planning authorities can have a local or regional definition of renewable energy that differs from this.
Regional energy strategies provide a useful mechanism for exploring the role of different technologies across a region. The suitability of different forms for particular locations and needs can be particularly important in steering the strategy. This should closely inform the evidence base for the Local Development Framework.
Some planning authorities, such as the Greater London Authority, require consideration of low carbon systems for developments over a threshold size. These would include any of the combined heat and power (CHP) or communal heat pump-based systems, which necessarily involve district heating and/or cooling pipework networks.
The EU 2020 renewable energy targets are met by providing renewable heat as much as by renewable electricity. As heat is much cheaper to produce (and free in the case of waste heat) there will be a significant incentive to increase the uptake to meet the binding targets in the most cost efficient way. This suggests that technologies such as CHP will be increasingly popular. It will be particularly important that waste heat is primarily used to serve existing buildings and industry to tackle the major challenge of retrofitting.
Research commissioned by the Communities and Local Government department as part of the introduction of the Code for Sustainable Homes investigated the differing costs of low carbon and renewable technologies. This analysis shows that the costs of achieving the higher code levels can vary quite substantially as a result of dwelling type, development type and site characteristics. The choice of energy technology was found to be central in the range of costs. Lowest costs were typically seen for those developments where there is potential to use site-wide carbon saving technologies (for example CHP systems). These are typically sites with relatively high numbers and densities of development.
Priority: develop a low carbon and renewable energy portfolio
Tags: energy, regions and subregions, cities and towns, neighbourhoods, buildings and spaces
CABE and Urban Practitioners
with the cities of Birmingham, Bristol, Leeds, Liverpool, Manchester, Newcastle, Nottingham and Sheffield